The debate on the sexual orientation regulations is now underway in the House of Lords.
They have already been opposed by the Archbishop of York and the Bishop of Winchester.
To quote Winchester at his vilest stating that same sex couples were "Less than the best, less than the most healthy and less than God's will".
Lords Alli and Smith have already spoken warmly in favour of the provisions to warm support from the Chamber.
The Vice President of the Humanist Society spoke in favour of freedom of religious viewpoints but of the need for the religious to not have the right to remove rights from others in pursuance of their beliefs.
Lord Lester spoke magisterially as he always does (and his stamp can be read in the Joint Committee on Human Rights report into the sexual orientation regulations) crititicising "misleading, homophobic and scurrilous statements" and "propaganda" used against the regulations, citing the Times advertisement placed by Coherent and Christian Voice, making completely "untrue statements", seeking to mislead people about the provisions.
He picked up on the Archbishop of York's attack, not just in the regulations, but even on the principle of human rights itself. He pointed out (completely correctly) that any provisions would have to read as being consistent with human rights provisions relating to the freedom of speech, conscience and religion.
Their Lordships are now in the process of voting on the hostile amendment to not approve the regulations. From the voice vote it sounded like the amendment would be defeated but I will update with the final vote on this when it comes.
THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT:
This means that the amendment opposing the regulations is defeated.
The regulations are now passed into law and take effect on the 30th April.
You can follow the debate live via the weblink here.